Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2232f44dbd71de6

Jump to content

Talk:Legal singularity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit request: attribution, thesis characterization, and reception

[edit]

I am Benjamin Alarie. I have a conflict of interest with this article: I coined the term in the 2016 article already cited as a reference, and I am co-author of the 2023 book also cited. Per WP:COI I am not editing the article directly and instead propose the following three changes for independent review. All proposed sources are either already cited in the article or are independent of me.

1. Attribute the origin of the term in the lead. The article cites Alarie (2016) but the prose does not state where the term originated. Proposed addition at the end of the first paragraph: :The term was coined by Benjamin Alarie in a 2016 article in the University of Toronto Law Journal. Source: the Alarie (2016) reference already in the article. Independent secondary confirmation: Weber (2021), already cited, which discusses the term as originating with Alarie, and Markou & Deakin (2020), already cited.

2. State the proponents' own formulation alongside the critics' characterization. The current second paragraph states that the legal singularity "could potentially lead to a situation where AI systems become the primary legal decision-makers, and humans are relegated to a more supervisory role, if any role at all," sourced to Weber (2021), a critical commentary. This presents a critic's characterization as the definition. For NPOV, I propose adding one sentence stating what the proponents themselves argue, before the critics' view: :Aidid and Alarie describe the legal singularity as a state in which law becomes "functionally complete" and knowable with practical though not perfect certainty, and argue that human accountability for legal judgment is retained rather than displaced. Source: Aidid & Alarie (2023), already cited. This is a descriptive claim about what the cited work argues, per WP:PRIMARY permissible use.

3. Add reception of the 2023 book. Proposed addition: :The Legal Singularity won the 2024 PROSE Award in Legal Studies and Criminology from the Association of American Publishers and was shortlisted for the 2023 Donner Prize. Sources (independent): https://proseawards.com/winners/2024-award-winners/ and https://donnerbookprize.com/2023-shortlist/

I recognize editors may adjust wording; my interest is accuracy of attribution and balanced presentation of the concept alongside the existing critical sources, which I think should remain. Thank you for reviewing. Qwerasdfzcxv (talk) 17:01, 23 July 2026 (UTC)Reply