Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22cdfa11d0ecf36

Jump to content

Talk:Legal separation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Mathsgirl in topic Ambiguous in one part

Untitled

[edit]

Title is misleading because the body is more specific than it represents. SD6-Agent 03:22, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Ambiguous in one part

[edit]

In the first numbered section, 'A mensa et thoro separation' this statement is made:

"The legitimacy of any future child born to the couple remains intact, and the spouses may not legally remarry."

I'm assuming this means they may not legally marry someone other than each other? Because technically, they can't remarry each other because they're still married to each other, yes? Common sense tells me that if they tried to apply for a marriage license to marry each other, they wouldn't be granted one because a clerk would rightly point out they are already married and any ceremony would effectively be a vow renewal but I'm by no means law-knowledgeable so I'm looking for confirmation of my understanding of exactly what that sentence is saying and hopefully, someone to amend it for the ignorant like myself.

I'm also curious, if a woman had a child while the couple are legally separated but the child isn't the husband's, who becomes the legal father of the child?

Mathsgirl (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply