Talk:Lee Wilson (author)

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: IMO an edge case regarding notability but I'm marking as reviewed. Happy editing.

North8000 (talk) 14:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Request to Remove Maintenance Tags

Hello editors,

I’m requesting a reassessment of the maintenance tags currently on this article. Since they were added, the following improvements have been made:

- All key statements are now supported by reliable third-party sources including The New York Times, USA Today, WFLA, Romper, Parade, Fatherly, Markets Herald, World Screenings, and Senal News. - The article now avoids promotional language and has been rewritten with a neutral, encyclopedic tone. - No sources used are affiliated with the subject. - Career, film involvement, large YouTube presence, and relationship expertise are all cited to independent publications.

Please let me know if anything further is needed. Otherwise, I respectfully request that the tags be reviewed and removed.

Historytenn (talk) 00:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Historytenn, I re-added the WP:NBIO template because, by my assessment, Wilson fails to meet any of the needed criteria found in WP:ANYBIO. Curiously, Wilson is listed as an author but the article doesn't make any mention of any books that he has authored.

Additionally, Wilson fails to meet the standards for coverage. Of the 8 sources, 2 can be argued as strong evidence that Wilson is notable:

• 3 do not mention Wilson at all
• 3 reference Wilson alongside other dating coaches (failing WP:SIGCOV)
• 1 is a local puff piece but I would argue works towards WP:RS
• 1 is an interview in a national publication, which is very good for justifying WP:NBIO

Given that there are two acceptable sources, it's possible that Wilson meets the criteria for a Wikipedia article. I'm just not seeing it yet and believe the template should remain until sources can demonstrate it. Vegantics (talk) 21:17, 16 June 2025 (UTC)