Talk:Leduc 022

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Leduc 022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Can attend to shortly Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

• Sources look reliable, prepared to AGF
• Is it standard to capitalize "throughout the Fifties " ?

• Yes, unless you're using the digits instead.

• It's not immediately clear to me what "Intended for service use," service refers to here-- remember that all work in the armed services can be called "service"
• I don't understand "and a time to 25,000 metres (82,000 ft) of only seven minutes." -- if it's just me being dull, feel free to explain here instead of in the article

• See if my change makes it any clearer

• Any information on the cost of the prototype?
• Is it really worth putting the sentence under 'Surviving aircraft' as a bullet point?
• MOS:ELLAYOUT recommends accompanying an entry in the 'external links' section with a brief description if it isn't clear what it is

• Indeed it does.

That's anything from me Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to review it, see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Eddie891:--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)