Talk:Learning Planet Institute
Add topic | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 May 2022. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Article creation
[edit] | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | This article contains a translation of Learning Planet Institute from fr.wikipedia. |
Hello. Disclosure: I was compensated by the Learning Planet Institute to write this article (also disclosed on my user page). I have just learned that a previous article on this subject was deleted following a deletion discussion in June 2022. I was not aware of it when I started.
This is a new text, translated and adapted from the French Wikipedia article. Most of its sources postdate that discussion, including Les Échos (2023), Mediapart (2023), Challenges (2023) and AirZen (2024), as well as the institute's 2025 designation as a UNESCO category 2 institute. I have tried to follow WP:NPOV and included the critical coverage.
If editors prefer, I am happy to move the article to draft and submit it through WP:AFC. Any feedback is welcome and I will address it promptly. Thank you. French Thutmose III (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- I just flagged the previous AFD onto the top of this page, then noticed these comments. In general, it is appropriate for an article author with a COI to take a draft article through the AFC process, and even more so when there was an adverse decision at AFD on a previous instance. That said, in this case, the present article looks sufficiently robust for AFC, and I can see other sources such as this (albeit in interview form), so if any other editors have notability concerns, reconsideration would probably be better through another AFD. AllyD (talk) 15:43, 4 October 2026 (UTC)