Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24bf1c92869cf52

Jump to content

Talk:Laurel forest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by TheRedDragon13 in topic Laurelindorinan not a botanical term

Laurel forest are different in english language

[edit]

Laurisilva and Laurel forest are different in english language — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.44.49.151 (talk) 08:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

They are different words, but is there any evidence that they mean different things? Sminthopsis84 (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Please see the merger discussion at Talk:Laurisilva. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 18:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Laurelindorinan not a botanical term

[edit]

What's Laurelindorinan doing here? It's a name Tolkien made up for the elf forest in Lord of the Rings! and that's where the link takes you. Someone has been mucking about methinks. Hackneymartian (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Same problem here - someone put laurelin (the name of one of Tolkein's Two Trees) in as a plant family that resembles Lauraceae. It's also not a botanical term. I'm removing it for now. TheRedDragon13 (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurel forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurel forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Subtropical rainforest" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Subtropical rainforest has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 2 § Subtropical rainforest(s) until a consensus is reached. Cremastra (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Reply