Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23a1c75da0d2e5c

Jump to content

Talk:Laura Lopes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Sentimental Dork in topic Birthday, again


Astor family

[edit]

On 31st December 2015‎, I removed an odd claim that Mrs. Lopes was "a member of the Astor family". ‎Monkelese reverted my removal. It is clear that Mrs. Lopes was born into the Parker Bowles family and married into the Lopes family. It is also clear that Mr. Lopes is descended from the Astor family. However, a person is not a member of every family from whom one is descended, let alone a member of every family from whom their spouse is descended. Mr. Lopes is descended from a great number of well-known and influential families, and we could easily increase the length of this article by several orders of magnitude by listing them. He is not, however, a member of any of these families, apart from his own (by which I mean the Lopes family) and neither is his wife. I have again removed the odd claim, and I hope my reasons are clear. -- Oliver P. (talk) 05:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Parents

[edit]

One of her parents is given as “Camilla Shand”. At the time of Laura’s birth, her mother’s name was Camilla Parker Bowles. Is there a reason not to use this name? JDAWiseman (talk) 23:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

When presenting genealogical information, it is customary to use birth names or the highest suo jure title. Surtsicna (talk) 00:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I wasn’t aware of the custom. And given which, birth name seems most sensible. JDAWiseman (talk) 11:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ancestry

[edit]
Ancestors of Laura Lopes
16. Algernon Robert Parker
8. Eustace Parker
17. Emma Jane Kenyon
4. Derek Henry Parker Bowles
18. Sir Henry Bowles, 1st Baronet
9. Wilma Mary Garnault Bowles
19. Florence Broughton
2. Andrew Parker Bowles
20. Sir Humphrey de Trafford, 3rd Baronet
10. Sir Humphrey de Trafford, 4th Baronet
21. Violet Alice Maude Franklin
5. Dame Ann de Trafford
22. Henry Cadogan, Viscount Chelsea
11. Cynthia Hilda Evelyn Cadogan
23. Mildred Cecilia Harriet Sturt
1. Laura Rose Parker Bowles
24. Alexander Faulkner Shand
12. Philip Morton Shand
25. Augusta Mary Coates
6. Bruce Shand
26. George Woods Harrington
13. Edith Marguerite Harrington
27. Alice Edith Stillman
3. Camilla Shand
28. Henry Cubitt, 2nd Baron Ashcombe
14. Roland Cubitt, 3rd Baron Ashcombe
29. Maud Marianne Calvert
7. The Hon. Rosalind Cubitt
30. George Keppel
15. Sonia Rosemary Keppel
31. Alice Edmonstone

This section was removed from the article for lack of references, but it's quite interesting, nonetheless. —capmo (talk) 17:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Birthday

[edit]

Mrs. Lopes' birthday is incorrect. Her birthday is April 19, 1978. I have a copy of her birth certificate from the General Register Office, which I obtained in doing research on the Royal Family. If you would like me to share this, I would be happy to do so, just let me know how. JasonKurth (talk) 17:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Step father?

[edit]

In what sense in Charles her step father? Has he adopted her? Charles just happens to be the man her mother married. The claim he’s her step father seems spurious at best. 2A02:C7C:362A:E200:ED80:CED6:B017:27B5 (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

But when you marry a person who already has children, those children become your step children. No adoption necessary  Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talkcontribs) 03:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why are some people saying that she is William & Harry's half sister as opposed to step sister? Is there suspicion that Charles is her biological father, despite her being born when Camilla was still in her first marriage? I'm confused.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talkcontribs) 03:49, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if there is any actual evidence of it, but there is, for example, this recent YouTubeVideo with over 1.2 million views which appears to be suggesting exactly that. While it might feel plausible, without confirmed paternity test results or official confirmation I wouldn't assume that it's anything more than an attempt to get a lot of views. More charitably, if the channel's operators are not native English speakers it might also be an error in translation - someone misunderstanding that step-sister and half-sister do not mean the same thing. RichardJFoster (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why portrait instead of photo?

[edit]

Why is the portrait of Laura Lopes used instead of her photo? There are many photos of hers available online. AdamMin1 (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Birthday, again

[edit]

We need a better reference than Getty Images for her birthday being April 19. Dates are often wrong on Getty, and if this date is correct, it doesn't mean very much, because the photo is of her celebrating her birthday, which could be just around her actual birthday and not on it. A user who has since deleted their page claimed to have a copy of her birth certificate, but did not provide it.

I do think her birthday is probably in April, and I don't think the user was lying, but there needs to be a more reliable source than a photo from Getty Images of Laura Lopes "celebrating her birthday" and a former Wikipedia user's claim with no evidence, especially when many other sources claim her birthday is January 1. Sentimental Dork (talk) 21:16, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply