Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a255361a6e2e5b65

Jump to content

Talk:Lattice QCD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by CommonsNotificationBot in topic File:Quarks gluons high res (Argonne).jpg Nominated for Deletion

Untitled

[edit]

Added: "At the moment, this is the most well established non - perturbative approach to solving the theory of Quantum Chromodynamics.", since the article presents Lattice QCD simply as "a lattice model of QCD" which is true alas, IMHO, Lattice QCD is nowadays the way to go in order to compute hadronic observables from first principles to say the least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.12.66.243 (talk) 04:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Quarks gluons high res (Argonne).jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Quarks gluons high res (Argonne).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 1 September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply