Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a252f18f688d224d

Jump to content

Talk:Larry Csonka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by SugnuSicilianu in topic NFLretired template

"Grow your mo"

[edit]

OK, what is the "Grow your mo" competition? 65tosspowertrap 19:04, 18 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

NFL Draft or AFL Draft?

[edit]

In the infobox, should it be NFL Draft or AFL Draft? The Dolphins were in the AFL.65tosspowertrap 13:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

User SugnuSicilianu has fixed the problem. It should be AFL draft. SoxrockProjects 14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

NFLretired template

[edit]

There are numerous reasons why this is a poor choice.

1. There are already hundreds of pages that have as templates for retired players either "NFL player" or "Infobox Pro Football player". They would all have to be changed for retired players.

2. Like other "NFL" templates, this one INCORRECTLY states several items: There was NO NFL draft in 1967-1969, it was a Common Draft; AFL players were NOT in "Pro Bowls", they were in American Football League All-Star games. Playerslike Billy Shaw and Charley Hennigan]] were never in the NFL, so how can they be covered by an "NFL" template?

3. Further, a "retired" template is REDUNDANT. The articles on the players under "Infobox Pro Football player" usually state that the man is a "former" or "retired" player, and if the man's statistics show for example that his last year was "1978", it's a pretty good bet that he's retired! SugnuSicilianu 11:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply