Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253381368591ae0

Jump to content

Talk:Laricoideae

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Casliber in topic Good Article status

Taxonomy

[edit]

The latest genetic-based taxonomic analyzes have revolutionized the entire subdivision of the subfamilies of the Pinaceae, including the Laricoideae. All entries should be updated entirely. For the moment, the previous classification is still followed and reported, as numerous studies are still ongoing. However, I await the opinions of the collaborators on the Wikiplants project.

Example: Laricoideae - PLwiki--JN95 (talk) 14:13, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
OK, Updated--JN95 (talk) 14:01, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy 2

[edit]

I inserted, in a special section, the last taxonomic positions expressed pending rewriting and review of the whole taxonomic system on en.wiki--JN95 (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy 3 and Minor Updates

[edit]

November updates--JN95 (talk) 22:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add dichotomous key--JN95 (talk) 05:10, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Taxonomy 09/2020

[edit]

Minor grammar corrections. --ReddishClover (talk) 10:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article status

[edit]

I reverted its rating as a Good Article as this article has not been through the GAN process. I think it has been well developed and is possibly within striking distance of GA status, if anyone wants to try and improve it Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply