Talk:Laramans

Comment

Ktrimi991 when you get a moment, give it a read.--Calthinus (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hey Calthinus, te lumshin duart :) I made some edits there some years ago but never had the time to make more. This article deservers attention. Very interesting topic. Ktrimi991 (talk) 10:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Βατο could I request your help with standardizing some of these cites? I know you're good at that :). --Calthinus (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Nice job Calthinus! I will do it soon ;) – Βατο (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Βατο think we could nom this for DYK or GA? --Calthinus (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Calthinus yes, it is well written, even for a GA nominee. – Βατο (talk) 18:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Please give me a ping if my presence is requested here, as I'm trying to take a bit of a break, but can check back for constructive purposes. Though any help is appreciated BATO.--Calthinus (talk) 07:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laramans/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I'm opening a Good Article Nomination review. Hoping to complete the review over the next couple of days. I'll be using the template below. Thanks! Ganesha811 (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

• This article passes GA status - well written, almost no edits or changes needed. Ganesha811 (talk) 15:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is remarkably clear. Good writing. Made a few minor tweaks myself. Pass.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Pass, no issues.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Citations are good - well referenced, clear attribution to academic sources.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Largely academic sources, some reliable news and other sources. Pass.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Pass, no notable issues.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Pass - no issues found.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Pass, no other major things found.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Pass, level of detail is good.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Potentially controversial topic - reliance on reliable academic sources and clear attribution. Pass.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Pass, no issues.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Pass, no issues found.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images are frequent and well-chosen/captioned.
	7. Overall assessment.