Talk:Language lab

Listing vendor names

Wikipedia is not a free advertising space. Companies offering language labs should only be mentioned in this article if they play (or have played) a significant role, and in that case independent sources should be cited which demonstrate their importance. Regards, HaeB (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

I was looking for a balanced and informative view of language labs at present but I don't think the article has got to this stage yet. It still reads as if it's written by a supplier. Chrisemms (talk) 19:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Tone, and sources

This article lacks sources aside from the introductory paragraph, and that is just for one fact. Also, the way this article is written seems to be from a one-person point of view, plagiarized, or straight out of someone's essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thiefxray (talk • contribs) 01:13, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Have to agree on that. Much of the information in the paragraph on "Problems" is contradicted in the 2004 Paper by Roby that is cited above. The information seems to make sense to me, but I would love to see where it comes from... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.143.114.202 (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2017 (UTC)