Talk:LanguageTool

Corrections

Hi, I'm the maintainer of LanguageTool, so I don't want to touch the article myself. Here are some corrections though:

• typo: tesis -> thesis
• grammar: now have -> it now has
• mass check of the whole Wikipedia -> it's actually only a small part of the Wikipedia that we check
• Initial release -> 2005-08-15 (see change log)

--Dnaber (talk) 10:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

  Done --Macofe (talk) 11:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Kindly, look into it, and i knew now one thing yesterday you are a very positive attitude person. So, may be in future if any opportunity will be raising for work with you. So i feel it will be a great pleasure for me.

Nischal Chaturvedi (talk) 04:29, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Warning

Found a bug in the WMF version. It removes the article from your watchlist. --Ancheta Wis   (talk | contribs) 03:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Sources

This article is a bit too self-referential... --Nemo 14:31, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Errors in article are uninspiring

These errors in the example don't give me confidence.

"Some would think you a fortunate man." is a valid construction, though perhaps beyond the ken of the average reader.

Consider using a past participle here: been. "...n. Yes it is, to a certain extend. Now, this is were my ignorance sets in. Type in one ore m...

- Wrong example sentence?

- 'ore' is a possible error

Humpster (talk) 05:12, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Now I get it. You are talking about the screenshot File:LanguageTool WikiCheck.png which I now moved to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2013-12-25/Recent research because it shows a former Wikimedia internal project not what LanguageTool looks like. We probably need something like File:Languagetool.webp but in English to showcase it properly. Matthias M. (talk) 08:55, 15 January 2026 (UTC)