Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a246eae9bdc7cf89

Jump to content

Talk:Lane Garrison

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by 99.251.192.204 in topic Irony

Irony

[edit]

There is quite an irony about this. 99.251.192.204 (talk) 16:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please keep accidents in perspective

[edit]

While the accident that killed the young man is a tragedy, lets keep things NPOV. We do NOT know if he was drunk or sober or what his level of fault is. Based on current information he may be a drunk driver guilty of manslaughter or he may be another innocent victim of an accident. He may yet face charges and will likely face a civil suit, but those are things outside our control or influence. The facts will play out in time and we should let those facts come out before we POST to Wikipedia. There are people more famous then Garrison who have killed people in auto accidents (like Laura Bush) but they were never charged. Remember, you have every right to make your own conclusions, but if you post here, make sure you are posting FACT and not opinion. Michaelh2001 08:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dubious

[edit]

He has pleaded guilty to drunk driving and vehicular manslaughter, so the above comment is outdated. I think it unfair criticism of Rev. Simpson to say that he has changed Garrison's behavior; what? from a thief to a manslaughterer? The sentence, although sourced (albeit outdated) should probably be deleted as WP:BLP. Any thoughts? Carlossuarez46 01:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Language standards of an encyclopedia

[edit]

I don't consider "...fellow prisoners had it in for him" to be a proper formulation for an encyclopedia. charon (talk) 11:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply