Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a251c3f0dd8b1e9f

Jump to content

Talk:Landscape Institute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by TomTurner2 in topic Sources

Speculation on LI Page

[edit]

This page has been edited, removing innacurate information regarding the institute's finances.

The text

"The Landscape Institute is currently undergoing upheaval, as it is virtually bankrupt due to poor financial control during the year 2007-008, which ended with a significant trading loss in spite of record income. - - The Chartered Member, Gabino Carballo, is fighting to have the accounts and expenditure scrutinized, as seen in the GardenVisit.com blog run by Tom Turner, of University of Greenwich."

is speculative, promotes one idividual and links to a blog which is not part of the work or professional purpose of the landscape institute —Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveKCole (talkcontribs) 14:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 06/04/09 ammendment restores the original text and removes the innacurate info


26/05/09 ammendment deleting the entry "In 2008, it became apparent that the Institute was heading for bankruptcy etc, etc" was made for the same reason as the previous ammendment. The user who added this ammendment should also note that Wikipedia is not a news site and should refer to the tenants of use for wikipedia before adding any further comment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosestevez (talkcontribs)


1/06/09 ammendmentdeleting entry for reasons given above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlosestevez (talkcontribs) 08:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Could we please have an editorial lock on this page to prevent this repeated addition of pov information. Wikipedia is not a noticeboard or forum and as such is not the place to announce "Members are calling for a new Extraordinary General Meeting". This ongoing addition of current affairs is tantamount to vandalism. --MrJerricho (talk) 13:58, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landscape Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Addition of Governance History (2008–2024)

[edit]

I have added a new 'Governance' section to the article. I previously attempted to document some of these events under a 'Crisis' heading, but I recognize that the framing was not sufficiently neutral.

This revised text focuses on a factual, chronological history of the Institute’s governance—covering the 2008 financial crisis, office location disputes, and the 2022 presidency vacancy—rather than a 'crisis' narrative.

A note to fellow editors: This section is strictly supported by reliable secondary sources and official reports. If you believe the text requires correction or removal, I kindly ask that you:

Explain the reason for the change here on the Talk page.

Provide a supporting reference for any factual adjustments.

Help maintain the NPOV balance between the official Institute position and independent press reporting.

The goal is to ensure the Institute’s 97-year history is recorded accurately and neutrally for researchers and the public. TomTurner2 (talk) 14:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The section should probably be removed completely given the lack of independent sources demonstrating any encyclopedic value or due weight.
You should not be adding your own writing as references, but carefully following WP:COI instead. --Hipal (talk) 16:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
After reading it over in light of the clear COI problems, I trimmed it down to just the "Governance Challenges 2022" section. That section seems UNDUE as presented, but has independent sourcing at least. --Hipal (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sources

[edit]

I note the maintenance tag regarding primary source reliance. As a disclosed member (see user page), I agree the article currently relies heavily on the LI website. This is partly due to the niche nature of professional history, where independent secondary coverage is scarce.

However, to improve neutrality and verifiability, I have recently added a 'Governance' section supported by independent reporting (The Times, HortWeek, Pro Landscaper). I am also happy to help swap out other primary citations for independent ones where they exist.

For example, I can look for citations from Tony Aldous’s 'Landscape by Design' (1979) and Geoffrey Jellicoe’s 'The Landscape of Man' (1975)—both independent published works—to verify historical milestones currently cited to the LI website. I welcome a neutral editor’s view on whether this would satisfy the maintenance concerns. TomTurner2 (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply