Talk:Landmap
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Dulcet bg in topic I recommended "keep" but the writing on this is crap
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
I recommended "keep" but the writing on this is crap
[edit]I recommended "Keep" at AFD, but the writing is pure incomprehensible crap (loaded with unexplained insider jargon) that shows arrogance rather than empathy to/for the reader. North8000 (talk) 18:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
- Someone fixed. North8000 (talk) 22:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Can you please explain the reason of calling the writing "crap"? This is not understandable and sounds rude for a national data center academic level free service. Dulcet bg (talk) 23:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
- I did give the main reason above. Incomprehensible to the average reader, loaded with insider-specific jargon. But the bad stuff has been taken out by others. North8000 (talk) 10:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- I saw the reason, but the usage of words to explain the issues were inappropriate. Thanks. Dulcet bg (talk) 19:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- My apologies for the rough language, particularly now that I see it came about as a result of two innocent things rather than deliberately written that way as a wikipedia article. ......creation of the material elsewhere, suitable for that venue, and then just bringing it over to this article. Doubly so with you being new. Sorry. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind response. Much appreciated. Regards Dulcet bg (talk) 09:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)