Talk:Lanco Infratech
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011
[edit]This article is based on references cited from independent sources (13 last count). Two editors have been reverting these edits and particularly changing the lead, adding what seems like a company advertisement in the top paragraphs. The two editors are:
- sharmaren : only edited lanco
- skmedikonda : has edited only articles related to L Madhusudan rao and lanco
I suspect these two to be people related to lanco, and i will request you to stop doing this. mukerjee (talk) 12:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Recent edits remove negative views – lanco infratech is audited co.
[edit]Several edits by "Gurpreet singh sardar" have removed some apparently negative information about the company (and some controversy). Tagged COI and Slanted Viewpoint, and would appreciate any input from others. Bananastalktome (talk) 15:45, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
- Identified edits as copypastes from Lanco Group's website, flagged for copyvio and informed editor. --Drm310 (talk) 05:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Appears as if that individual was a sockpuppet of the user Sharmaren, who was also banned for copyvio in this article. --Drm310 (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
- I just performed a rollback of a series of edits that added material lifted directly from the Lanco website. Dac04 (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Possibly another sockpuppet or at the very least, another COI editor. They also created a page about another Lanco staff that was speedily deleted. --Drm310 (talk) 20:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- I just performed a rollback of a series of edits that added material lifted directly from the Lanco website. Dac04 (talk) 16:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Overly slanted negative tone of article corrected
[edit]Removed excessive negative tone of the article.Overall the article overall requires masive clean-up and the information to be presented in well formatted manner.
Whenever a company lay-off employees, they face such negative remarks in websites like Wikipedia.Almost every company like this have controversies, losing contract bids, etc. But blowing-up only negative remarks make the intention of the contributors questionable. And Wikipedia should not be a place for such personal and prejudiced opinions. Ask27 (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)