Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24937cc9dc53524

Jump to content

Talk:Lambert Hamel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Gerda Arendt in topic Theater-maker

References section

[edit]

Hi @User:Boleyn, can you please explain to me your reasoning behind including a reference section in an unreferenced article? I don't know what BLPunref drive is and what this has to do with adding an empty section to a page. Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, as these are all slowly getting refs as part of the drive, they all need sections, though I would argue all articles need references sections anyway, as if they don't have refs, they should :) It means it is there and ready for as refs are added (while going through these, quite a few did have refs, you just couldn't see them in a clear section). It can also further emphasise the need to add refs. There isn't any rule against having a references section which is waiting for references, and it will be useful. Thakns, Boleyn (talk) 20:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi @User:Boleyn, thanks for the explanation, but as there doesn't seem to be a clear guideline for including empty ref sections, I can't agree with you. It doesn't make sense to me to have an empty section on a page—it just looks bad. The Citations template on top is sufficient to emphasize the need for refs, so I don't see the usefulness of an additional prompt at the bottom. I'm going to remove it in the meantime, as this discussion should have been started as soon as I first reverted you, but we can certainly continue discussing, in the hopes of reaching an agreement. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 20:52, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Theater-maker

[edit]

Gerda Arendt, no character is named or called Theater-maker in the linked play. Wis2fan (talk) 04:16, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

(a ping works only when signed) The main character's name is Brucson, who is described per the title as a Theatermacher ("Theatre maker"). Perhaps there's a better word in English for someone who makes theatre, which - at least in German - has a double meaning, theatre also in the sense of (overly) dramatic behaviour, and this double meaning certainly meant in the play. "Mach kein Theater" is a synonym for "calm down, too much ado about little". It is unclear whom the author meant, and Claus Peymann was one of the candidates, an Intendant who made great things happen on stage, and not so great things by drama at courts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:27, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply