Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a241c3fb69dfa3ae

Jump to content

Talk:Lady Rhea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by ~2026-17450-84 in topic Very biased

Concern over 'advertorial' copy

[edit]

As a UK based Wiccan I have never heard of Lady Rhea but I am quite happy to believe she exists and is notable (in Wikipedia terms.) However someone needs to provide citations to secondary sources to give evidence of this notability. Also the second half of this stub is an advertisement for the shop and needs deleting or completely rewriting. Kim dent brown 21:52, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

As there has been no re-writing of the advertising style copy, I have removed it and also the tag I placed last month. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 12:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lady Rhea & Christianity Portal

[edit]

I've so far seen two Wiccan high priestesses somehow incorrectly affliated with the Christianity portal. I've tried to see if there was any way as to edit this, but to no avail. As a last resort, I was hoping someone with more knowledge of editing Wikipedia pages would change this because Christianity & Neo-Paganism are two completely different religions. Please change this becuase it is incorrect.151.198.138.217 (talk) 13:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the clergy infobox sticks the portal in there automatically. I got rid of the infobox and the portal is now gone. Asarelah (talk) 16:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

D.o.B.?

[edit]

Date-of-birth is a standard feature. Valetude (talk) 23:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Very biased

[edit]

Someone started a thread on this 18 years ago and no edits have been made. This article is very biased and reads like an ad with uncited info, long quotes, irrelevant information, and word use errors (“accordioning to herself”). ~2026-17450-84 (talk) 00:46, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply