Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23990fcfc3fb86e

Jump to content

Talk:LaTeX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Useful / Interesting LaTeX packages

[edit]

Seeing as we already have a Frontends section, why not add another section for useful packages such as LaTeX-beamer? Liyang 06:52:26, 19 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

"stylized with the system as"

[edit]

"LaTeX (/ˈlɑːtɛx/ LAH-tekh or /ˈleɪtɛx/ LAY-tekh), stylized within the system as LaTeX, is a software system for document preparation."

The wording here is a bit clunky. How about "stylized within itself as"? Thoughts? Will change unless anyone has objections. CampWood (talk) 00:22, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply


INHO, I think "stylized within the system as LaTeX" should be taken out all together, and so the first sentence should read:
"LaTeX (/ˈlɑːtɛx/ LAH-tekh or /ˈleɪtɛx/ LAY-tekh) is a software system for document preparation."
Is there a reason to indicate this "stylization" in the first sentence of the article? Or even anywhere in the article? There is afterall an image of the LaTeX logo in the infobox of the article on right Wickedjargon (talk) 23:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

IPA error

[edit]

For the pronunciation of the word LaTeX, two options are given: (/ˈlɑːtɛx/ LAH-tekh or /ˈleɪtɛx/ LAY-tekh).

However both incorrectly use x (ch in loch) as the final coda position consonant. The non IPA transcription is also wrong. A more appropriate transcription would be:

(/ˈlɑːtɛks/ LAH-tekhs or /ˈleɪtɛks/ LAY-tekhs  Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.243.57 (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is not wrong; it is indeed pronounced with "ch as in loch". I've heard people say "LAH-tek", but "LAH-teks" is wrong and "LAH-tekhs" makes no sense at all. –St.nerol (talk) 19:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
The footnote should not say (as it currently does) "commonly mispronounced as /ˈlɑːtɛk/ or /ˈleɪtɛk/"; that is inappropriate prescriptivism. If a pronunication is commonly enough used, then it becomes correctly or at least acceptable. See also Pronunciation of GIF. 78.32.131.8 (talk) 02:37, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Both you and St.nerol are wrong. The Latex Project website as referenced in source 2 says LaTeX is pronounced "to rhyme with «blech» or «Bertolt Brecht»". This is a bit confusing, since the coda of Brecht is /çt/, but the sensible interpretation is that LaTeX is supposed to be pronounced ending in /ç/, since neither /x/ nor /ks/ come close to rhyming with Brecht. Of course /ç/ is not an english phoneme, so how people actually pronounce the word will be different and should be reflected in the article Tasimnal (talk) 10:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is correct. The current version references a source for the pronunciation, but it's misinterpreted. Bertolt Brecht is not pronounced like "Brekt". The pronunciation currently mentioned as "also pronounced as" is the "official" one, and the others are "also pronounced as"-alternatives. The X in LaTeX is pronounced similarly to the J in the spanish Jesus or Juan. Dynolderbo (talk) 10:54, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Etymology?

[edit]

I always had the idea that "LaTeX" was short for "Look-ahead TeX", i.e., because of something to do with its parser.
(I was probably wrong, as I guess LaTeX doesn't differ from TeX when it comes to parsing.)
But I just noticed a mention on this page that it stands for "Lamport's TeX".
In any case, the article should probably say. —scs (talk) 12:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why is it written like this

[edit]

The way this article is written is weirdly breathy and sycophantic. Can this be changed please. 2600:8807:810A:9F80:AA71:899E:5BF9:5027 (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Can you suggest some improvements that you think would help? JBW (talk) 23:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

CoCalc LaTeX screenshot

[edit]
CoCalc LaTeX white paper

Hey Kinu, I cleaned up the CoCalc LaTeX screenshot. Wikideas1 (talk) 16:26, 21 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Backslash

[edit]

Shouldn't the use of the backslash as part of latex code be mentioned explicitly somewhere in the article? ~2025-34917-65 (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

This feels a bit like a sales pitch more than a Wikipedia article?

[edit]

I'm sure this is helpful but it seems like I'm reading the brochure in LaTeX's lobby apologies if this is rude just a concern I'm not much of a wikipedian but i appreciate yall SantosKemmer (talk) 02:32, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Could you clarify or give an example? Or point me to the relevant section of the article? 1101 (talk) 21:45, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply