Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, as I noted in the title this bitmap is still present in Kernel Image Executable (NTOSKRNL.EXE and similar), so it is probably still used if there is failure in ACPI on newer Windows, also XP (and below) doesn't need ACPI compliant system, so it is possible to see this message on old systems as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.159.131.54 (talk) 21:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've used Windows 98 and made my own LOGO.SYS files, all uncompressed (no RLE). And they all work fine, despite being over 125KB and despite what this article says, so, I feel like either a correction or a citation is needed for the claim that a plain, non-RLE encoded BMP would have been "entirely too large" RetroFanboy990 (talk) 05:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
