Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21fbcb328f68cc1

Jump to content

Talk:LOCC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Insurrectionist in topic Untitled

Untitled

[edit]

I think this article is far too concise and not correct enough in its language. For instance, it refers to two 'particles' in a Hilbert space -- never mind that Hilbert spaces are mathematical constructs which do not contain things called 'particles'! It also talks about performing measurements 'in' or which certainly needs qualification.

I'm mostly worried about how little this article discusses the usefulness of the paradigm of LOCC. It needs to be clear that it is a formalisation of the physical situation that two separate experimenters share a state in their joint Hilbert space, and that entanglement (whatever it is!) does not increase under such operations. By getting a grip on the sorts of operations which do not increase entanglement, we can attempt to quantify entanglement and how much of it is necessary for various Quantum Informational tasks. I'm hoping someone other than me will do this, but I will try to edit this article when I have time. Insurrectionist (talk) 07:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply