Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a272cb737823c6f8

Jump to content

Talk:LNG carrier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by LeadSongDog in topic New Building

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Noahsandvold. Peer reviewers: Maxschmidig.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Units of capacity for the English Measurement System

[edit]

I find the English Measurement System capacities being provided in liquid cubic feet confusing. In industry articles about LNG tankers capacity is typically provided in cubic meters for metric liquid volume, and sometimes in BCFe (billion cubic feet equivalent) for English. A typical 2017 built LNG tanker that can transit the newly enlarged Panama Canal holds about 3.5-3.7 BCFe. When I see that the Christophe de Margerie has a 6,100,000 cubic feet capacity, it is easy to mis-interpret that as 6.1 BCFe, which I think is much larger than it actually is? Perhaps both US gallons and BCFe could be provided instead of cubic feet. As a reader of the article both of those would be more useful than measuring liquid capacity in cubic feet. -- Gregfreemyer (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Propulsion

[edit]

The Reliquefaction section says "Normally an LNG tanker is powered by steam turbines with boilers" but the "inside of a LNG carrier" diagram shows a reciprocating internal combustion engine. So I'm left wondering which it is. Maybe it's normally steam turbines, and the diagram shows an abnormal type. Kendall-K1 (talk) 02:15, 2 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

My understanding is steam turbine propulsion for LNG tankers lost favor in the early 2000's and by 2005 most new builds were dual fuel diesel electric. I'm not sure enough of that to adjust the main article. -- Gregfreemyer (talk) 15:09, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

New Building

[edit]

Section currently gives me no sense of how long it takes to build these ships. What is the overall time from purchase order to delivery of a new ship? How many large carrier ships can be under construction simultaneously? How many (how long) will be needed to replace the now-doomed Nordstream 2 pipeline capacity? LeadSongDog come howl! 16:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)Reply