Talk:LC3 (codec)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Difference LC3 and LC3plus

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could someone with more knowledge on the subject clarify the difference between the two? Do they have different licenses that make one more freely adopted than other? LC3plus seems to be an enhancement, there will be any reason to use the first LC3? Or is LC3plus better in all aspects? Was there any disagreement between Bluetooth SIG and ETSI? Why are there two versions at the launch? It would be nice to have those things cleared up. —Arthurfragoso (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dispute

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"The conclusion regarding Opus is disputed", so I want to see the dispute, but I cannot find it from any of the provided links. Can someone knowledgeable please fill in a link for where this "dispute" can be investigated? Thanks. Keith.blackwell (talk) 20:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

LC3+

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Creative Technology Ltd. refers to LC3+ in conjunction with ULL (Ultra Low Latency) within their marketing materials for a subset of their products that support LE Audio. Is LC3+ distinct from LC3plus? Noiseiron (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:LC3 (codec)

Difference LC3 and LC3plus

Dispute

LC3+