Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
Only superficially. Tail's different. Wings are smaller. There's no cockpit at the front, fuel is different. Top speed is much higher. There are many other differences, and I highly doubt that the current artist impression would look anything like the final flight article.- (User) WolfKeeper (Talk) 14:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We can read "effective exhaust velocity of 40,900 m/s or specific impulse of 4170 s". That would be right for a rocket, but for an air breathing engine, the Isp is not calculated from Isp=Ve/9.81 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cometo22 (talk • contribs) 12:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply