Talk:L&YR Class 32
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by 2605:E000:9149:A600:3832:5234:5BA4:7DB6 in topic How can physical presence not be mass?
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How can physical presence not be mass?
[edit]If something is present then is it not by default a mass of some measurement? Otherwise if something is not present then it is non-existent. All the "things" mentioned as being applicable exist according to some plan or specifications then are they not by default present or mass. Regardless in what configuration they may be or design they are present and therefore mass. Even if you flung a Harry Potter Invisibility Cloak over it, it would still remain mass otherwise whenever that cloak is in use that which is under it would not be there. And the film clearly points out that the cloak hides not disappears something.2605:E000:9149:A600:3832:5234:5BA4:7DB6 (talk) 02:14, 24 June 2018 (UTC)