Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25573dafd81231f

Jump to content

Talk:L&YR Class 28

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Pechristener in topic In fiction

In fiction

[edit]

The locomotive

[edit]

According to The Origin of James the Red Engine, it is said the Class 28 is the rebuild of the Class 27, designed by George Hughes, due to the addition of a Belpaire firebox and the extension of the footplate.

The statement above is wrong. Class 28 is about superheating, see here the Hughes Classification scheme 1919:
  • Class 27 is defined as 0-6-0 All other classes, saturated
  • Class 28 is defined as 0-6-0 superheated
Note that all Class 27 locomotives had at delivery round top boilers, but some were later modified with Belpaire boilers w/o superheating. Engines, which received superhating, were transferred to the Class 28. New built Class 27 had either round top boilers or Belpaire boilers. Some Class 28s were rebuilt to saturated steam locomotives.
Pechristener (talk) 12:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

James' Changes

[edit]

In The Island of Sodor: Its People, History and Railways, the changes made to James from a real Class 28 that I put on this article are stated as canon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Megasquid500 (talkcontribs) 01:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have updated the James the Red Engine article with the available information about the prototype. At present I have put the barest minimum here, complete with references. More is available at James's article. -- EdJogg (talk) 00:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply