Talk:Kymco
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kymco article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|1= {{WikiProject التوكيل داخل مصر بش موفر قطع غير لجميع الموديلات وده يجعل العميل بالتردد في شراء المنتجات من كيمكو
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:43, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Consumer Reports comparison
[edit]In March 2009 Consumer Reports magazine tested the Kymco People 150, Yamaha Vino 125 and Vespa LX 150 in the 125-150 cc class, as well as the Honda Rebel, Kawasaki Ninja 250 in the 250 cc class and the Honda Ruckus and Motorino Allegro int the 50 cc class. The lead of the 125-150 section was, "The 150cc Kymco People and Vespa LX 150 were the best overall scooters."
While Consumer Reports is a credible source, this was their first ever attempt at testing any two wheeled vehicles. They made mistakes like choosing only a 3,600 foot track, which is why they never got above 86 mph with the Ninja 250. But the main issue is the tiny handful of scooters and motorcycles they tested. This makes claims such as that the Kymco tied for first place a little absurd; it tied for 1st out of only 3 scooters.
Individual data points from the CR test are probably reliable, but their overall conclusions are dubious, especially when many other media offer more comprehensive and rigorous reviews. --Dbratland (talk) 22:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- Consumer Reports will always be a dubious source after they tried to fake the test results for Suzuki SUVs. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzuki_v._Consumers_Union Santamoly (talk) 07:58, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Kymco#Kymco_in_the_United_States
[edit]"Kymco is not a part of Honda." Why is this in the article?Degen Earthfast (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:51, 17 July 2025 (UTC)