Talk:Kutia
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Female Dog
[edit]In Hindi, Kutia literally translates as a 'bitch'.
Milk or cream
[edit]When would milk or cream be used? My understanding is that kutia is usually made only for Christmas Eve, which is a fast day, prohibiting the use of dairy. —Michael Z. 2006-01-11 22:11 Z
In the Roman Catholic interpretation a fast day or day of abstinence means no eating of meat is allowed. Fish and dairy are allowed. This is different from Orthodox, where AFAIK, it means something like vegan restrictions. So, to answer you question partly, there would be no reason for restricting dairy content in kutia. Plenty of other traditional Christmas Eve dishes in Polish cusine contain dairy and fish. See the rather good article on Wigilia. Vowofsilence 00:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I also see this recipe for the first time. Newer heard of using milk or cream in Ukraine. Poppy seed become "milky" after you crush them. Romanians use kutya (koliva) for funeral meal.--Bryndza 03:42, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching my makitra/makohon gaffe. That's what happens when I write without reading.
General recipe
[edit]This should be moved to Wikipedia:Cookbook. `'mikka 04:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Take 0.5 kg each of wheat and poppy seeds, or slightly more wheat.
The wheat grains should be simmered in hot water on low heat for 3-4 hours.
The poppy seeds should be simmered in hot water until they can be crushed between the fingertips. Then they should be ground three times in a food processor or a meat grinder. Traditionally, the poppy seeds were crushed in a mortar and pestle made specifically for this purpose (makitra and makohon, respectively).
Strain out the water from the poppy seeds and from the wheat and allow them to cool.
Mix the cooled poppy seeds and wheat, then add some liquid honey (you may need to add a little hot water to dissolve it) or dissolved sugar (0.1-0.2 kg by our sample measures) and some or all of: nuts, raisins, almonds, pieces of oranges (amount of these extra ingredients vary a lot between recipes, suggested is 0.3-0.5 kg total).
Relationship to kolyvo
[edit]According to the Ukrianian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, kolyvo is "a dish of wheat cooked with honey" eaten at furnerals. Sounds exactly like kutia and koliva. Is there really any difference? --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 00:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Lithuanian equivalent
[edit]It is worth mentioning that in Lithuania, a traditional dish kūčia is being served at the dinner table on Christmas Eve. https://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C5%AB%C4%8Dia 79.132.162.163 (talk) 10:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Polish cuisine
[edit]Merangs, could you please explain your continued reverting of mine and other users' contributions here? Help me understand why you refuse to accept that kutia is a dish that has been present in Polish cuisine for centuries. There are already various sources in this article, and many more available online, in books, etc. that clearly show this as a traditional dish in Poland. Though it is primarily associated with eastern Poland, it can also be found in other regions. Some sources, including Polish and non-Polish ones, describe it as something of pre-Christian origin. This suggests kutia is an older custom that Poles inherited from their early Slavic ancestors before Poland even existed as a state; therefore it seems to be a heritage shared with Belarusians, Ukrainians, and so on rather than an invention of any single people.
However, even if that were not the case and, for example, it would be proved that instead kutia came to the Poles from the Ruthenians (also a possibility, for all we know), then why would this make it any less Polish today, after potentially over a thousand years? Cultures are influenced by their neighbours and other peoples. This is normal and no nation is "pure" (it would be pretty boring if they were). Poland has an Eastern European cuisine that shares many similarities with Belarus, Lithuania, and Ukraine, but its eating habits have been shaped by culinary influences from Germany, Russia, Italy, and France as well. Would you refuse boiled potatoes with dill and butter the status of a traditional Polish dish simply because potatoes are native to the Americas? What about kotlet schabowy, something so ubiquitous yet with a much shorter history of consumption in Poland than kutia? What about the various Silesian dishes, are you going to go around Wikipedia and remove mentions of Poland there simply because those foods originated in a specific region? According to you, which regions and their cuisines deserve more right to be classed as nationally Polish than others?
I almost never edit other language Wikipedias, but out of curiosity I checked a few versions of this article today. In the Polish, German, French, Czech, and Russian articles, kutia is described as a Polish dish also - either in the article itself, by the category or both. Likewise, I saw that in Spanish it used to be, until you removed it. I didn't bother checking others, but I wish I had looked this up earlier because it would make it obvious that there seems be some kind of personal agenda involved here. Please remember that anecdotal evidence cannot be used a source on Wikipedia to add or remove content. E.g. My Polish family and friends don't eat kutia, therefore kutia is not Polish (assuming that would even be the main reason for your peculiar actions regarding this article)… Arguments like that are especially baffling when you look at the plethora of sources saying that kutia has been present in Polish cuisine for such a long time and continues to be.
Furthermore, when I first expanded this article in February 2024 with information on kutia in Poland, you removed it all by saying that, "this tradition is not widespread and is being popularised by radios, and media, as outlined by sources. Let's focus on key countries where kutia is staple". Eventually, you allowed the information to remain after I challenged your deletion and restored my contributions, but you made sure to either completely remove or heavily downplay mentions of Poland in the introduction, infobox, categories, etc. Simultaneously, you have failed to provide a single source to show that the media is somehow exaggerating the history of kutia in Poland or pushing an agenda to make it more popular. If anything, it seems to me that you have come here to push the opposite agenda, without any evidence whatsoever. In April 2025, you responded to another user that "It's not native nor widespread so no greater significance"; again, what is your source for this? Now it's October and you say that claiming kutia as part of Polish cuisine is "Highly debatable from a contemporary perspective", but thus far you have refused to take part in any real debate.
Due to all of this, I have now restored some of the content you kept deleting from this article. I am open to discussion and would be interested in seeing any sources to back your claims, but until then I cannot allow your POV to continue shaping this article. --Pitsarotta (talk) 17:06, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- C-Class Ukraine articles
- High-importance Ukraine articles
- Ukrainian culture task force articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- C-Class Belarus articles
- Low-importance Belarus articles
- C-Class Poland articles
- Low-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles
- C-Class Armenian articles
- Low-importance Armenian articles
- WikiProject Armenia articles
- C-Class Lithuania articles
- Low-importance Lithuania articles
