Talk:Kustom Amplification

selling point

The article says that the main selling point was their look. I think that the fact that they used solid-state electronics was also important, but I have no reference for that. (I know it was for me.) Bubba73 (talk), 05:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Article size

Why has this article been stripped down to a stub? Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 18:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Some one else removed most of the text. Just now I looked at the old text, it sounds like it was copied from some website or book, also it has NO references either. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 02:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

OK, thanks for taking a look at it. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 03:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kustom_Amplification&diff=1272306365&oldid=1220662430 • Sbmeirow • Talk • 03:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Is it lifted from that directly? Rewording could work. (PS that is my amp pictured.) Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 04:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

wut? it shows the comparison of "before" (left side) vs "after" (right side). You can't just rewrite it without adding references to verify the text.

Reminder that you need to document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable. This isn't social media, thus you need to prove what you write.

Reminder that you need to add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.

• Sbmeirow • Talk • 09:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I misunderstood about the comparison. Was the old text lifted from the article that is cited? I didn't write any of the old article. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 00:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)