Talk:Kryo
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
plagarism
[edit]@Rajat491: Thank you for your recent addition of the Kyro 260. However, please do not copy text from the source verbatim. This is plagarism and is a violation of wikipedia policy (see WP:PLAGIARISM). I would suggest summarizing the material instead. Dbsseven (talk) 14:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
move
[edit]I suggest we move this article from "Kryo (microarchitecture)" to simply "Kryo". There are now at least five iterations of Kryo (original, A53 derived, A73 derived, A55 derived, and A75 derived), so it is not a "microarchitecture" so much as "microarchitectures", or probably more precisely a CPU brand. I don't think it's particularly controversial, so I'm not going to {{Merge}}. But I'm posting here in case anyone objects. Dbsseven (talk) 22:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
need reception
[edit]need info on how well received these cores are. relative performance etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.248.79.199 (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Octa-core (4×1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4×1.6 GHz Kryo 240)
[edit]Octa-core (4×1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4×1.6 GHz Kryo 240) 103.102.132.255 (talk) 05:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)