Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a283b1320aee0ecd

Jump to content

Talk:Krushnashastri Chiplunkar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Jonathansammy in topic Mahadev Ranade

Removal of Proposed Deletion

[edit]

Hi @Bearian,

I have removed the Proposed Deletion warning because there are references online that mention this person. There simply needs to be more editing efforts to add that information to the article.

I have added 'Needs additional sources' warning. I hope this is acceptable. Cheers! Kingsacrificer (talk) 21:37, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

That's fine. Thank you for the notice, Kingsacrificer. Bearian (talk) 21:59, 4 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Mahadev Ranade

[edit]

@Jonathansammy

Thanks for reverting my edit. It is certainly a strange one.

I checked the library's About Us page (https://punenagarvachan.org/index.php/history/) and even there they mention this.

In establishing the library, eminent personalities namely Justice Mahadeo Govind Ranade, Lokhitvadi Gopalrao Hari Deshmukh, Krishnashatri Chiploonkar, Prof.Kero Laxman Chhatre, Daji Neelkanth Nagarkar, Vishnu Parshuram Ranade, Sonya Bapu Mande, Vishnu Moreshwar Bhide & others took wholehearted efforts with toil & money.

It's so strange. What do we trust? Kingsacrificer (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Since we know that a six year child (Ranade) couldn't have been a founder then we have to use our judgement and not include his name.Also the library page is not acceptable as source per wikipedia policy, a source always has to be third party.Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 20:31, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
No, I meant the actual source - Hindustan Times - used it. Should we be reporting that source somewhere? Kingsacrificer (talk) 20:59, 6 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
These days I wouldn't trust newspaper articles for their accuracy. For historical persons and places I start with Google scholar. Also I stop my search at year 2008 because after that even some lazy academics started using Wikipedia as their source. This is what is called "circular referencing". My two cents. Jonathansammy (talk) 14:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply