Talk:Klammbachwaldbahn

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Nothing in the article makes a claim of notability of the railway. Is the rail category intended to be a comprehensive compendium of every bit of rail ever laid? Bongomatic (talk) 05:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is notable to have an article in German Wikipedia, and I'm not sure where you draw the line, but this was a discreet railway. Maybe you would like to point to some guidelines on this issue? I've never seen any. --Michael Johnson (talk) 05:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Klammbachwaldbahn

Notability