Talk:Kitsap Transit

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kitsap Transit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160919172210/http://www.portorchardindependent.com/news/19830439.html to http://www.portorchardindependent.com/news/19830439.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Updating the fleet

Not sure why half my stuff was deleted however, even without sources its clear that the fleet needs to be updated as its from 2016. The reason its overly detailed is due to the fact the Kitsap Transits fleet is weird with the numbers of the buses being weird. Editttorrr (talk) 21:31, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

@Editttorrr: All additions must be made with reliable sources to allow for verifiability to be upheld. As long as data from 2016 is clearly marked as being from 2016, there's no issue with verifiability. As for the level of detail, notes about individual buses belong on a fan wiki (such as CPDTB) rather than here, where there is a more general scope. Many bus fleet tables have been outright removed due to the sheer amount of detail, so going lean is better. SounderBruce 22:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Understood, however I think its better to have updated information instead of extremely outdated info. If you don't want the bus fleet tables then just remove them all together instead of having really outdated info. Also along with that I would like to mention that Wikipidia is free to edit compared to CPDTB which you have to apply to become one and half the time that does not even work. Editttorrr (talk) 22:26, 2 July 2025 (UTC)