Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21e223e7e90d945

Jump to content

Talk:Kitchen hack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Valereee in topic BrEng?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kitchen hack showing how to separate an egg using a water bottle

Created by Valereee (talk). Self-nominated at 11:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC).Reply

  • The article was moved into the mainspace the same day of nomination, so it is new enough. It is long enough. QPQ done. It does not appear to violate copyright and is presented neutrally. Citations are reliable and hook is ok. I am not the most experienced DYK reviewer so I have a question about the use of a video. I haven't been able to find anywhere in the rules that a video is okay to use, but I haven't found anywhere that explicitly prohibits it. This is my only question about the nomination. Skyes(BYU (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Maile66, nah, that is a video I took myself and uploaded to commons! That's my thumb and my kitchen counter. :) Did I do it wrong? --valereee (talk) 21:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
trout Self-trout It's not you, it's me. I mis-read the ".webm". Mr error. Sorry. @Skyes(BYU): if there were no other issues, you can pass this nomination. — Maile (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
lol...I was like...The New Daily...? :) --valereee (talk) 21:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
In that case, everything looks good. Skyes(BYU) (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

BrEng?

[edit]

Coffeeandcrumbs, why BrEng? —valereee (talk) 11:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Valereee, no reason. As original author, you may choose any EngVar. I don't think there is any WP:NATIONALTIES. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 12:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don't have a strong opinion, but unless/until we have some reason for specifying a variety in an article -- any article, really -- I'd prefer not to, unless there's been some agreement that we should specify for every article. Otherwise doing it before it's needed just feels...I don't know, like marking territory? :D —valereee (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply