Talk:King penguin

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2019 and 8 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shannonnancysw.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Couldn't see it in article

What is their average life span in the wild and in captivity?RafikiSykes (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

The following is excerpted from the article: "King Penguins noot noot on subantarctic islands..."

Please clarify what "noot noot" means... or if this is spam, please fix it; students of science (such as myself) are no doubt perplexed by this verb — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldenknitter (talk • contribs) 20:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

noot noot is a penguin meme, I cannot fully remember the name of the show but all the penguin said was "noot noot" So everytime a penguin is named, noot noot comes to the internets mind :0 ~2026-27641-14 (talk) 14:20, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King penguin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110828111320/http://www.indianapoliszoo.com/SitePages/PlanYourVisit/PenguinChat.aspx to http://www.indianapoliszoo.com/SitePages/PlanYourVisit/PenguinChat.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

The world's largest king penguin colony has collapsed, losing nearly 90 per cent of its population

Is it worth including some text on the page about the colony collapse circa 2018?

The article mentions possible reclassification of vulnerability status, I am not knowlageable on the subject, is anyone else willing to chime in?

This was my source, however a paper was published in "Antarctic Science".

https://vancouversun.com/news/world/the-worlds-largest-king-penguin-colony-has-collapsed-losing-nearly-90-per-cent-of-its-population/wcm/0f6fcff8-e568-414c-92ef-162e94a072d5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by TKeWhite (talk • contribs) 13:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

King Penguin

The king penguin is a species of penguin, witch means that it is flightless.It sorta looks weird to me though.

Noah Mathews Gmail: 1972535700@hcs-students.net

Contradiction in whether the king penguin is monotypic

The taxonomy section states that the king penguin is monotypic and has no subspecies. However, the introduction to this article, as well as the page for the Aptenodytes genus, state that there are two subspecies of king penguin: Aptenodytes patagonicus patagonicus in the South Atlantic Ocean and Aptenodytes patagonicus halli in the South Indian Ocean. Should this statement be removed from the taxonomy section, or is there some other detail here that needs to be clarified? RedKnight7146 (talk) 02:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, I ran into the same thing and dug into it. Wikipedia follows IOC taxonomy, which (per the cited ref) does consider the species monotypic. Other taxonomic authorities, however, recognize 2 subspecies. Rather than delete the info on the subspecies, which would leave the article poorer (and would also leave it inconsistent with the included range map, which I can't readily edit), I documented the disagreement, citing the Avibase taxon grid, and left it at that. I also consolidated the subspecific info under the Taxonomy heading; it is too down-in-the-weeds for the lede.

I touched up the genus page as well, in less detail. Gould363 (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC)