Talk:King World

Major updates to meet standards

I have just cleaned up a good portion of this article to better meet Wikipedia standards. It could still use some work, but hopefully that helped. - SuperOctave, 6 April 2007

File:GW347H195.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:GW347H195.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Bold text

Before it was reverted, I had removed some bold text from this article because I thought it wasn't used properly; not saying that all bold text is forbidden on Wikipedia. One reason is that "King World Enterprises" is already in bold in the introductory sentence. Another reason is that some company/service names in the body text are not synonymous with the exact topic company, with an exception from the next reason. Lastly, most other company articles in general do not have the names of related companies/services in bold, unless if they're deserved to have their own section or paragraph for notable reasons. TheGGoose (talk) 03:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)