Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2605b8f8cb42a7e

Jump to content

Talk:Killick Millard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Tom Morris in topic Ian Dowbiggin

Ian Dowbiggin

[edit]

This person is hostile to voluntary euthanasia and for his views on Millard to form the whole article, as they do now, raises undue weight issues. For an example of Dowbiggin's views, we have "Dr. Dowbiggin makes the case that Canadians and Americans should not support the legalization of either assisted suicide or actual mercy-killing."  RATEL  10:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have restored the use of Dowbiggin as a source. I strongly disagree with Dowbiggin, and there are a few things which I find concerning about his paper in the Journal of Contemporary History, but it is a reliable source for the history of the euthanasia movement in Britain. It cites research done by Nick Kemp for the book Merciful release, which I've used heavily in the history section of Dignity in Dying. There's nothing wrong with using Dowbiggin as a source for the history of euthanasia. His anti-euthanasia POV is not hidden and he doesn't seem to mangle the facts. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC)Reply