Talk:Killer Bees!/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 4 hours ago by Whipmywillows in topic GA review
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Whipmywillows (talk · contribs) 19:40, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Dragonhawk12 (talk · contribs) 01:50, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, list incorporation and table accessibility:
- A. The prose is clear, concise and understandable to an appropriately broad audience, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- References are laid out correctly
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- WP:EARWIG's highest percentage is a 5.7%. No copyvio here.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- No edit wars present.
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, have suitable captions, and have alt text:
- Images have proper licenses and captions, but they are missing WP:ALT text.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Hello! I will be reviewing this article for the October GA backlog drive. Your first GAN was one of the first reviews I did, and it was during the last GA backlog! I guess it comes full circle. I am (a little) more experienced, so hopefully this review goes well. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 01:50, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- Coming back around! Good to see you again. You get to do another Odyssey 2 game. There's not quite as much to this one, but I think it still deserves it. Whipmywillows (talk) 03:33, 7 October 2026 (UTC)
- I realized there was some new sources and information I had discovered after creating the nomination so I've gone ahead and added those. Whipmywillows (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2026 (UTC)