Talk:Ki language
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by IntergalacticOboist in topic Possible title change
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Copyrightpower1337 (talk · contribs) on 18 January 2021 with the comment: No information online and unlikely to be expanded. Listed as having 26,000 speakers almost 40 years ago, language likely has died out. It was contested by Matt91486 (talk · contribs) on 18 January 2021 with the comment: Removed PROD. It has sources. Whether the sources are online is entirely irrelevant, as is its possibility of future expansion. A stub is not a reason for deletion. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Added Biloa source
Biloa, E. (2013). Syntax of Tuki: A Cartographic Approach. John Benjamins Publishing Company. UICLing (talk) 22:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Biloa (2013, p. 35) also references 26,000 speaker number but I didn't know how to edit the box without removing other citation.
Possible title change
[edit]All sources seem to describe this language as Tuki. I don't think I've found any sources that describe it as Ki. The glottolog and ethnologue both list it as Tuki. Is this appropriate circumstance for a name change? IntergalacticOboist (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)