Talk:Keystroke-level model

Kieras first pub. date

The documents I've found are dated 1993, still there's also evidence of 2001 as the date. I've edited adding both. The 1993 version seems a 'manuscript' from the University of Michigan. Some evidences:

• http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/259709.html (1993)
• http://courses.wccnet.edu/~jwithrow/docs/klm.pdf (1993), it's missing a page
• ftp://www.eecs.umich.edu/people/kieras/GOMS/KLM.pdf (2001)

--Folletto 11:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was PAGE MOVED per discussion below to Keystroke-Level Model. I've also created a redirect from Keystroke Level Model. -GTBacchus^(talk) 01:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

KLM (human-computer interaction) → ? — I disagree with the use of acronyms as the sole title of the article. — ThomasOwens (talk) 12:54, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support ThomasOwens (talk) 12:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

• Support move to a name that is in common use. Baileypalblue (talk) 19:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

• I would support a move to either Keyboard-Level Model or Keystroke-Level Model, as long as the other term was a redirect to the actual article. ThomasOwens (talk) 12:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

• Ghits for some move possibilities: "Keystroke-Level Model" 7,640 ghits, "Keyboard-Level Model" 202 ghits, "KLM-GOMS" 555 ghits, "Keystroke-Level Modeling" 512 ghits. It looks like Keystroke-Level Model is the best option, with redirects created where necessary. Baileypalblue (talk) 20:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  • OTOH Keystroke Level Model has been searched more on Wikipedia than Keystroke-Level Model (or the current article title, for that matter) so maybe the phrase without the hyphen would be more useful. Baileypalblue (talk) 20:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
    • I've only seen it written with a hyphen, so the title should reflect that. ThomasOwens (talk) 21:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
      • There are some uses online, see here and here for examples, but looking again at the google search I agree the use with the hyphen appears to be more commonly used as the title; other uses may be unrelated hits or informal expressions of the idea. The hyphenless alternate might be useful as a redirect. Baileypalblue (talk) 21:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Reorganizing of the article with references

The whole article was recently reorganized with references for each statement. This was done as part of the media informatics masters programme of the Universität Regensburg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warm-plateau (talk • contribs) 15:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Request for Feedback: Keyboard Latency Test Tool Link

Hi everyone,

I came across an online Keyboard Latency Test Tool that allows users to measure the delay between keypress and system response in real time. This could provide a practical resource for readers interested in understanding input delays and their impact on the keystroke-level model.

Would it be appropriate to include this tool in the External links section as a supplemental, hands-on resource for readers who want to test and analyze keyboard latency themselves?

I’d appreciate your thoughts before making any edits. Mughal Hayan1 (talk) 17:55, 2 August 2025 (UTC)