Talk:Key employee

Economics Low‑importance

	Economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I added a reference to the 401(k) article about top heavy provisions, where the term key employee comes into play. So there's a single link now. Should I leave the now-incorrect orphan hatnote there until a few more links are added - what's the rule of thumb?Timtempleton (talk) 19:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Orphan" is all or nothing. If there's one actual article (not a redirect, not a disambiguation page, not a user or talk page) leading here, then you can remove the "orphan" tag. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I took care of it. By the way, see Wikipedia:Orphan#Criteria. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Key employee

Untitled