Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a243fa570e82cf36

Jump to content

Talk:Ketene cycloaddition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Bernanke's Crossbow in topic Prevailing Mechanism: Mechanism (2)

Prevailing Mechanism: Mechanism (2)

[edit]

Not sure how to comment properly, but I think the product formed here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketene_cycloaddition#/media/File:KetMech.png) is incorrect, if someone can double check? @OrganicReactions Testtubewasher12345 (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Testtubewasher12345: Unfortunately, pinging OrganicReactions/Michael Evans isn't likely to help.[Inside-Wikipedia Drama 1] I'm not sure what the problem with the diagram is, but I'm hardly an expert. If you can explain why you think the diagram is incorrect, the nice folks at WP:Wikiproject Chemistry would be happy to draw a correct diagram.
(I've since moved the page contents to Ketene, but the picture you're worried about is still there, under Ketene § Stereochemistry.)
Best of luck, Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 20:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Inside-Wikipedia drama

[edit]
  1. It seems Evans was a reference spammer and plagiarist who hasn't shown his face here since he got caught in 2010.
    A more charitable interpretation might be that he was a good-faith contributor who didn't realize that uploading review articles to WP put them in the public domain. He chose such niche topics that by the time the problem was explained to him, he'd dug himself a gigantic legal hole and figured it was better to hide.
    The problem with that interpretation is that he appeared to have been paid by the journal to upload the articles.