Talk:Keswick Museum
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Keswick Museum and Art Gallery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141006074630/http://www.cumberlandnews.co.uk/new-beginning-for-keswick-museum-1.1138037 to http://www.cumberlandnews.co.uk/new-beginning-for-keswick-museum-1.1138037
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Napoleon's teacup
[edit]I suggest we remove the mention of Napoleon's teacup from this article. The statement that "it is no longer on display" is unsourced and therefore cannot be verified per WP:V. Also a previous edit said, in respect of it belonging to Napoleon, "there is no evidence to support this provenance" so it seems to me misleading to me to include it. (In short we cannot be sure that it is not there, but even if it is there, it may not have belonged to Napoleon!) Dormskirk (talk) 22:14, 27 August 2025 (UTC)