Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2581370a8f0f54b

Jump to content

Talk:Kepler-80

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 days ago by Fancy Fox Jr in topic Spectral type of the star

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 22 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): NannaBM.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Expanding on the lead section and adding details to the Planetary System section.

[edit]

I have added some more information about the star, and extended on the "Planetary system" section. The article still needs a lot of work! I would suggest adding some more details of the planets in the system; which types they are thought to be, and some of their characteristics. I also think that the "Orbital resonance" could use some editing. It is lacking references, and could maybe use a bit more general description that could make the section easier to read.  Preceding unsigned comment added by NannaBM (talkcontribs) 20:18, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Clarify the frame of reference that rotates with the conjunctions

[edit]

How quickly does this frame rotate? In which direction? The video at 204.03 Mariah MacDonald - Confirming and characterizing the five-planet resonant chains of K2-138 and Kepler-80 on Vimeo seems very relevant, but also not quite specific enough. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Spectral type of the star

[edit]

The article claims that the star is M-type, but it is actually a K-type star. Could someone fix this? Thanks. Fancy Fox Jr (talk) 06:20, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply