Talk:Kepler-48
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Pancakes321 in topic Need helping making page
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Need helping making page
[edit]I have no idea what I am doing, pls send helpPancakes321 (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
- A good way to write a new star article is to copy an existing one, but be careful to replace the content and not leave things lying around from the other star. Or you can copy boilerplate bits like the starbox, navboxes, and categories, then tweak to suit. Also good is to pick a notable star; WP:NASTRO describes what makes a star or other astronomical object notable. This one seems dubious. Nobody has bitten the bullet and nominated it for deletion yet, but it pointedly hasn't passed the new article review process either, so it is in limbo. Having your pride and joy deleted after days working on it can be frustrating, so picking an object (for example) already in the list of stars for that constellation is one way to improve the odds. Hiwever, Kepler-48 is/was already in List of stars in Cygnus and it probably isn't notable, so no guarantees. Lithopsian (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- I expanded this page purely because it is the first Kepler-XX star to not have a page for itself (Kepler 1-47 all have their own pages) and decided to expand it... then I found out K-49 is also empty ;v; Pancakes321 (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Are they all super earths-
[edit]The published sources suggest that two of them are denser than earth (c is ~Moon-Mars density). Pancakes321 (talk) 02:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
yipi
[edit]The nerd2 have been summoned Pancakes321 (talk) 00:59, 14 March 2025 (UTC)