Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23368ab2a19376a

Jump to content

Talk:Kentucky General Assembly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Needs cleanup

[edit]

This article is in sore need of reformatting and general cleanup. Please help if you can.  Stevie is the man!  Talk | Work 16:07, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wow, what a mess.

[edit]

I'll try to reformat some of these longer lists, that may help to a degree.

Hyper Anthony 17:52, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

That ought to do it. If anyone else can come through and improve it further, please go right ahead. :D

Hyper Anthony 18:37, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I just did some formatting hacks and standardization. Hope that helps.  Stevie is the man!  Talk | Work 01:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh, and by the way, thanks for your great work, Hyper Anthony! :)  Stevie is the man!  Talk | Work 01:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge with Kentucky General Assembly

[edit]

Currently, we have four articles, three of them stubs and one a start at best, describing Kentucky's legislature (Kentucky General Assembly, Kentucky House of Representatives, Kentucky Senate, and Legislative Research Commission). Wouldn't it be better to have one good article instead? Acdixon 20:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Per no discussion, I have performed the merge. Acdixon 15:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merge, second discussion

[edit]

After I merged Kentucky Senate and Kentucky House of Representatives into this article the first time, another editor came back and split them again. I still favor the merged version until the two houses develop significant content. Apparently, User:HiB2Bornot2B agrees. Acdixon 16:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do in fact agree. I apologize for not stating my reasoning for it, but it doesn't seem that we should have the small stubs of articles when they can be part of the entire Kentucky General Assembly article (as stated by Acdixon as noted in the first discussion regarding the merger of these articles. I can suggest that the seperate articles for the house and senate redirect to the general assembly article. -- Steven Williamson (HiB2Bornot2B) - talk 20:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that nearly every other state has separate articles for the Legislature, the Upper House and Lower House. Having Kentucky merge them all into one would seem to discourage people from expanding the articles. Most states have lists of the members. That would help expand the pages. Chadlupkes 00:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'd like to see consistency among the states. My own preference would be to have a List of current state senators and a List of current Representatives, rather than embedding them in articles. Most of the states with separate articles for their Upper and Lower Houses don't have much beyond those lists anyway. Or, de like Iowa and have Boxes.Flatterworld 05:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Merging the articles is a bad idea. The Kentucky Senate and Kentucky House are very different and have different histories and memberships, and different roles. Further, the Legislative Research Commission is NOT a part of the Kentucky General Assembly. (It cannot be, under the Kentucky Constitution.) Each deserves a separate article. Trying to merge them into one article would result in a long, difficult and unwieldy article on various separate subjects. They merit separate articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LanternLight (talkcontribs) 18:02, 17 February 2008

Some info out-of-date

[edit]

A good deal of info in the "Standing Committees" section is out-of-date by five years or more. If standing committee info is going to be part of this page, would it be fair for someone to please update that section with current standing committee info found on the Kentucky Legislature Home Page? Current Senate standing committee info is available here: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/committee/standing_senate.htm

Current House standing committee info is available here: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/committee/standing_house.htm

Based on the above links, I suggest that the standing committee info should be listed separately since the committee names differ in each chamber and that info should be updated like this:

Sources: Kentucky Legislature Home Page, Senate Standing Committees: http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/committee/standing_senate.htm Kentucky Legislature Home Page, House Standing Committees: http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/committee/standing_house.htm Burden88 (talk) 03:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I suppose the all-caps is used for committees and the mixed-case is for subcommittees. For Wikipedia, we should use bullets and sub-bullets instead. —BarrelProof (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Burden88: Perhaps there is a separate guideline that supports this, however, Wikipedia does not welcome simple listings (WP:NOTDIR). I'm not sure how significant this info is, and perhaps the list should be removed from the page altogether. Feel free to reopen the edit request if you find significant grounds on which this should be added. Regards, VB00 (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kentucky General Assembly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply