Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22639696cbf5e37

Jump to content

Talk:Kentico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Caleb Stanford in topic Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comments left by AfC reviewers

[edit]
  • Comment: Three best sources:
    * E15 – respected Czech business news outlet.ref name="e15"
    * CzechCrunch – online Czech publication.ref name="czechcrunch-investment"ref name="czechcrunch-2018"
    * lupa.cz – online Czech publication.ref name="lupa.cz-chatbot-ai"
    (Posted by User:Goldfinch.me, 11 August 2025)
  • Comment: Borderline for NCORP with only the e15 source, see comments below. If you find other sources, you can post them for review (as an AFC comment, please), but don't just use LLMs to generate the source list bc they often get reliability/notability/in-depth wrong. Please see WP:LLM before using LLMs to engage in discussions with other editors. Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:59, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: AFAICT, the e15 coverage looks usable. I wouldn't categorize either of the Noviny articles as in-depth coverage (despite reliability, see this discussion on the noticeboards). They are very brief and basically quotes from people about the company (see WP:NCORP#Significant coverage). The TechCrunch article is similarly not really in-depth, primarily about Kontent, not Kentico, though it does mention Kentico as more than a passing mention. Also, WP:Perennial sources says "TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying verifiability, though their articles often have too little independent analysis to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH."
    Overall, that leaves us with one source only (e15), and I don't find significant evidence that these sources can be used to meet WP:NCorp. Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:54, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: Three best sources:
    * TechCrunch – independent, high-profile tech publication with strong reliability.ref name="techcrunch"
    * Hospodářské noviny – major Czech national economic newspaper.ref name="hncz-ucommerce"ref name="hncz-2018"
    * E15 – respected Czech business news outlet.ref name="e15"
    (Posted by User:Goldfinch.me, 10 August 2025)
  • Comment: Some advice: please post your best WP:Three sources here (on the draft page) so that other editors can review. Happy to take a look. They need to be independent, reliable, significant coverage, and in secondary sources. No idea if CMS Critic and CMSWire are reliable, but the evidence from previous discussions of cmswire (1 2 3) suggests that they aren't. I will decline for now, but you are welcome to try your best three sources and happy to review if GNG is met. Caleb Stanford (talk) 19:47, 10 August 2025 (UTC)Reply