Talk:Kenneth Harkness

Untitled

Revert vandalism by Rook_wave. In this case social security number of deceased person is relevant because it establishes his real name and date of birth, which is different from his reported date of birth.i)

User:Rook_wave vandalized or rewrote all my biographies, invariably deleting content. He is no longer active or has been blocked. I am quietly trying to reinstant the content which he removed. Sam Sloan 16:51, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

I am not "invariably" deleting content, I always provide an explanation. And I am not blocked, why should I? The social security number does not fit into an encyclpedic article. Have you ever had a look at an encyclopedia? Have you ever seen a social security number? That people use different names in public than their given ones, is very common, despite that, you will hardly find any other biographic entry with that information. It is just fair, that it has been deleted again. Rook wave 19:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

evaluation

I rated this article start class and mid importance. I think it is just barely in Start class instead of stub. I'm wondering about the mid importance - with all of the things he did, should it be High importance? Bubba73 (talk), 13:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Mid or Low would be my guess. ChessCreator (talk) 22:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)