Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2391dc42a5befad

Jump to content

Talk:Kelly Services

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scandal

[edit]

Should probably add section on that time their VP had an affair and the corporation did extensive online damage control. 66.244.81.248 (talk) 23:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

POV? Reads like an Ad

[edit]

I removed the NASDAQ acronyms because it started the whole article off with an advertising tone...My edit summary got hosed because of "an itchy thumb" lol - actually this was from this tiny laptop I'm using. My palm keeps touching the touch pad. It's taking some time to get used to. E dog95 00:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply


This reads like an advertisement straight out of their brochure - hardly the encyclopedic article I was looking for. --67.41.201.191 (talk) 05:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits

[edit]

For some reason a flurry of editors have changed the text of the opening paragraph to match the contents of Kelly Serives website. I'm continuously reverting it to a non-copyright violation version.

http://ir.kellyservices.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=443213

What's going on here? Dawnseeker2000 14:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

I reverted some copyvio additions but the old version is scoring 83.6% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector when compared to http://www.studymode.com/essays/a-Report-On-Kelly-Service-Inc-1660130.html. This is actually a worse score than before I revered it. I was going to gut out all offending paragraphs but the content is referenced well enough that it made me wonder if Studymode are copying from us.

Please can anybody have a look and offer opinions on this? If we are plagiarising them then most of the article has to be deleted but if their article is based on our content then we will do nothing of the sort. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Given the source, it's likely that studymode copied from Wikipedia. The current version is pretty straightforward and neutral. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

WP:THIRDOPINION

[edit]

Regarding this request for a third opinion:

Copyright issues aside, this edit reads like an advertisement and is a blatant violation of WP:NPOV. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Introduction and infobox: Kelly Services request

[edit]

Jane KS (talk) 19:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Jane. On behalf of my employer, Kelly Services, I propose an update to the Wikipedia article's Infobox and introduction. Please see the following rendering and markup, which I am sharing for easier implementation (as appropriate):

The above is an improvement to the current article in the following ways:

  • the Infobox parameters have been copied over to the complete, up-to-date Infobox template
  • the Infobox has been updated with the company's former names, address, and areas served
  • Terence E. Adderley's title has been changed from "Chairman" to "Executive Chairman", which is more accurate
  • services are now displayed using the "Flatlist" template
  • revenue figures and the number of employees has been updated, with sources provided
  • the lead is updated and better sourced

Given the above discussion about the wording of the introduction, specifically whether it presented a copyright issue, I've taken steps to try to prepare appropriate wording that complies with Wikipedia's guidelines. I am hoping to find someone who is willing to implement this edit request on my behalf. I prefer not to edit the article directly given my conflict of interest. Thank you. Jane KS (talk) 19:57, 30 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Jane KS, I'm impressed. It's seldom that we see a PAID editor striving to make an article less promotional. Thank you. I'd leave this set for a couple days and if no one voices a concern, go ahead and add it. I'll check back in a few days. The page has less than 30 people watching it, so that's why no one addressed your edit request. Feel free to ping me if you have others. Great job! Thanks. - John from Idegon (talk) 18:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
The changes to the intro look good to me, definitely an improvement. Are you proposing to remove the "History" section, or did you not include that above because you're leaving that as is for now? OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I edit from an Android and cannot execute this change as it involves copying more data than my buffer will allow. i crash every time. John from Idegon (talk) 19:00, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I updated the page with the proposed edits. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Ohnoitsjamie: Thank you very much for your help. I have marked this edit request as answered. @John from Idegon: No problem, thank you so much for trying. Jane KS (talk) 14:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've fixed the template to make it show as as answered. Thanks for your work! ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 18:36, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Infobox, Introduction, and History Section: Kelly Services Request

[edit]

MichaelBC1 (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'm Michael. On behalf of my employer, Kelly Services, I'm proposing potential edits to be made to the Infobox, Introduction, and History sections. Im requesting these edits for the sake of updating these sections with more recent, detailed, and relevant information. I’ve included a rendering and a markup of the potential edits for easier viewing and integration (if approved):

I’ve reviewed Wikipedia’s terms and guidelines, and made an effort to use wording that complies with these conditions. I’m posting these potential edits on Kelly Service’s Talk page due to my conflict of interest, and in hopes that someone will be willing to add these edits instead. Thank you! MichaelBC1 (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


Reply 27-OCT-2019

[edit]
  • Exact, verbatim descriptions of any text and/or references to be removed needs to be given.[1] Reasons why each change is sought should also be provided.[2] Your request states only that it wishes to "add new claims" or "remove outdated claims". In Wikipedia there is no such thing as an "outdated claim". If the claim is that a company made X amount of dollars for 2018, that claim would not be deleted because the amount the company made in 2019 was a different amount. Both claims ought to be retained.[a] If these claims are to be removed because they are incorrect, then it should be stated how and in what way they are incorrect.
  • In the section of text below titled Sample edit request, an example for how incorrect claims are to be fixed is shown:
  • Claims to be added to the article should be kept separate and distinct from claims to be modified.
  • All references proposed to be added to the article ought to be formatted using whichever citation style is already in use with the article.
  • Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed with the verbatim text to be removed, the specific reasons for removal, along with the claims to be added and their reasons. Thank you!


Regards,  Spintendo  03:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notes

  1. This is to be done in moderation, as the company's Wikipedia article is not to become a collection of listed financial figures.

References

  1. "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 15 September 2018. Instructions for Submitters: Describe the requested changes in detail. This includes the exact proposed wording of the new material, the exact proposed location for it, and an explicit description of any wording to be removed, including removal for any substitution.
  2. "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 15 September 2018. Instructions for Submitters: If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.


@Spintendo: Hi Spintendo. Thanks very much for the explanation of edit request formatting and distinguishing of claims to be added and claims to be modified. I really appreciate that! I'll definitely post a properly formatted edit request soon and thanks again for your help! Regards, MichaelBC1 (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


Infobox, Introduction, and History Section: Kelly Services Request

[edit]

MichaelBC1 (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I’m Michael, and on behalf of my employer, Kelly Services, I’m proposing that some potential edits be made — both in terms of adding content and modifying content — to the Kelly Services wikipedia page. I'm requesting these edits to add more recent and relevant information. I've included a rendering and markup of these potential edits for easier viewing and implementation (if accepted):

I made an effort to use wording that complies with Wikipedia's terms and conditions after reading through these guidelines. I'm posting these edits here due to my conflict of interest, and am hoping that someone is willing to add these edits, if accepted, instead. Thank you! MichaelBC1 (talk) 05:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply 29-OCT-2019

[edit]

Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request.  Spintendo  09:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Spintendo: Hi Spintendo. Thanks very much for reviewing my claims to be modified and adding the ones that were accepted! I really appreciate that. I think I may have misunderstood an element of your initial explanation and wanted to double check -- when saying that claims to be added should be separate from claims to be modified did you mean that they should be brought up in completely separate edit request posts? If so, should I repost my proposed claims to be added in their own separate post? Also, for the edit that was 'unable to be implemented' due to my not specifying where the redundancy is, could I post another edit request solely about that in response to your post here? Or would I need to start a new post made specifically for that individual edit request? Thanks again for all of your help, and for reviewing and adding these edits! MichaelBC1 (talk) 16:06, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Claims to be added and claims to be modified should be kept separate in the same request, like so:
By placing the items under an organized list, every separate item may be dealt with together under one request. Regards,  Spintendo  18:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Adding to the History Section: Kelly Services Edit Request

[edit]

Hi. On behalf of my employer, Kelly Services, I'm asking for help with the editing of some claims that I'm proposing be added to the Kelly Services wikipedia page (specifically, the History section). This is for the sake of providing the page with more relevant information for various periods of Kelly Services development as a company (e.g., specifying when and how certain services began to be offered between the 1960s and the 1990s). Below is a rendering, markup, and four edit requests for easier viewing!

I'm posting these edit requests here due to my conflict of interest, and in hopes that someone is willing to add these edits, if accepted, instead. Thank you! MichaelBC1 (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

 Not done The requested changes are promotional of Kelly's services. Regards,  Spintendo  18:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 5 February 2026

[edit]

Change "As of 2019, the CEO is Peter Quigley." to "As of 2025, the CEO is Chris Layden."

Change "Key people Peter Quigley (president & CEO)" to "Key people Chris Layden (president & CEO)" Chrt502 (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. {{GearsDatapack|talk|contribs}} 19:23, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Please see the following sources:
https://www.kellyservices.com/press-releases/kelly-announces-selection-of-chris-layden-as-president-and-chief-executive-officer
https://www.kellyservices.com/about-kelly/leadership/ Chrt502 (talk) 19:34, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply